Wednesday, October 22, 2008

This may or may not be a good approach

Just wanted to get your opinion on an idea that may or may not be a good approach. I have heard about people searching for proposition 8 in google and then clicking on the "yes on prop 8" or "no on prop8" paid ad links that appear at the top of the search results in google. Each time someone clicks on these links it is costing that campaign money. I guess clicking on the "no on prop 8" ad is costing Hollywood stars like Ellen money they donated to the no on 8 campaign. I imagine if you were to break out the donations made to each campaign that the yes on 8 campaign's donations have been made by at least twice as many people as the amount of people contributing to the "no on 8 campaign". The majority of donations made to the "no on 8" campaign have been made by Hollywood starts like Brad Pitt, Ellen Degeneres, and Steven Spielberg. Don't forget the CTA, is it a bad idea for people who feel betrayed by the $1.2 million donation made by the CTA to fight back by clicking on the "no on prop 8" paid search link multiple times each day? What do you think......

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Your blog is great and I feel like asking no on 8's:
Hey! Got Research? Bashing, accusations, emotions are running high in this election about Prop. 8 but I'm not seeing people talk about the hard-core research. There is no hate in facts. They just are. And they are in support of yes on Prop. 8...

The country of France did their homework. They read the research and decided to put children's needs first because kids thrive more in a heterosexual marriage. Don't believe me? Read the research yourself:
http://www.journeychristianministries.org/CPA-SSA-marriage.pdf

Thanks! htt://www.abbyearth.wordpress.com